Methods and limitations in validation of footprint models
- 27 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Vol. 127 (3-4) , 223-234
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Turbulence characteristics and dispersion in a forest—tests of Thomson's random-flight modelAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2004
- Comparison between measured tracer fluxes and footprint model predictions over a homogeneous canopy of intermediate roughnessAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2003
- Impact of non-local advection on flux footprints over a tall forest canopy: a tracer flux experimentAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2003
- Spatial source-area analysis of three-dimensional moisture fields from lidar, eddy covariance, and a footprint modelAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2003
- Experimental determination of turbulent fluxes over the heterogeneous LITFASS area: Selected results from the LITFASS-98 experimentTheoretical and Applied Climatology, 2002
- The LITFASS project of DWD and the LITFASS-98 experiment: The project strategy and the experimental setupTheoretical and Applied Climatology, 2002
- Direct and Adjoint Monte Carlo Algorithms for the Footprint ProblemMonte Carlo Methods and Applications, 1999
- Footprint considerations in BOREASJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- Observations and large‐eddy simulation modeling of footprints in the lower convective boundary layerJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- How large must surface inhomogeneities be before they influence the convective boundary layer structure? A case studyQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1995