Defining and Estimating Intervention Effects for Groups that will Develop an Auxiliary Outcome
Open Access
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Mathematical Statistics in Statistical Science
- Vol. 22 (1) , 74-97
- https://doi.org/10.1214/088342306000000655
Abstract
It has recently become popular to define treatment effects for subsets of the target population characterized by variables not observable at the time a treatment decision is made. Characterizing and estimating such treatment effects is tricky; the most popular but naive approach inappropriately adjusts for variables affected by treatment and so is biased. We consider several appropriate ways to formalize the effects: principal stratification, stratification on a single potential auxiliary variable, stratification on an observed auxiliary variable and stratification on expected levels of auxiliary variables. We then outline identifying assumptions for each type of estimand. We evaluate the utility of these estimands and estimation procedures for decision making and understanding causal processes, contrasting them with the concepts of direct and indirect effects. We motivate our development with examples from nephrology and cancer screening, and use simulated data and real data on cancer screening to illustrate the estimation methods.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal Models for Randomized Physician Encouragement Trials in Treating Primary Care DepressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2004
- The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) StudyJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2003
- Covariance Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Observational StudiesStatistical Science, 2002
- Administrative and artificial censoring in censored regression modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Bounds on Treatment Effects from Studies with Imperfect ComplianceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Adjusting for Differential Rates of Prophylaxis Therapy for PCP in High-Versus Low-Dose AZT Treatment Arms in an AIDS Randomized TrialJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1994
- Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean modelsCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1994
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effectMathematical Modelling, 1986
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983
- Identifiability of Finite MixturesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1963