Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review
Top Cited Papers
- 5 October 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 29 (2) , 109-113
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2007.08.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Industry Sponsorship to Published Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Clinical ResearchClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2006
- Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- A meta-analysis comparing trials of antimuscarinic medications funded by industry or notBJU International, 2006
- Bias from industry trial funding? A framework, a suggested approach, and a negative resultPain, 2006
- Relationship between drug company funding and outcomes of clinical psychiatric researchPsychological Medicine, 2006
- Why Olanzapine Beats Risperidone, Risperidone Beats Quetiapine, and Quetiapine Beats Olanzapine: An Exploratory Analysis of Head-to-Head Comparison Studies of Second-Generation AntipsychoticsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Money, Method and Medical ResearchEpisteme, 2004
- Clozapine v. conventional antipsychotic drugs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A re-examinationThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- A study of manufacturer-supported trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of arthritisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994