Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- surgical oncology
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (1) , 166-174
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.04.172
Abstract
Purpose Prior studies have demonstrated superior outcomes after a curative surgical resection of rectal cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because these studies often lack detailed information on tumor and treatment characteristics as well as cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. Patients and Methods We studied a nested cohort of 1,330 patients with stage II and stage III rectal cancer participating in a multicenter, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy trial. We analyzed differences in rates of sphincter-preserving operations, overall survival, and cancer recurrence by hospital surgical volume. Results We observed a significant difference in the rates of abdominoperineal resections across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (46.3% for patients resected at low-volume, 41.3% at medium-volume, and 31.8% at high-volume hospitals; P < .0001), even after adjustment for tumor distance from the anal verge. However, this higher rate of sphincter-sparing operations at high-volume centers was not accompanied by any increase in recurrence rates. Hospital surgical volume did not predict overall, disease-free, recurrence-free, or local recurrence-free survival. However, among patients who did not complete the planned adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (270 patients), those who underwent surgery at low-volume hospitals had a significant increase in cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.72; P = .04 for the trend) and a nonsignificant trend toward increased overall mortality (P = .08) and local recurrence (P = .10). In contrast, no significant volume-outcome relation was noted among patients who did complete postoperative therapy. Conclusion Using prospectively recorded data, we found that hospital surgical volume had no significant effect on rectal cancer recurrence or survival when patients completed standard adjuvant therapy. Sphincter-preserving surgery was more commonly performed at high-volume centers.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Impact of Patient and Provider Characteristics on the Treatment and Outcomes of Colorectal CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Relation of Surgical Volume to Outcome in Eight Common OperationsAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomySurgery, 1999
- Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer SurgeryJAMA, 1998
- Surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the state of Maryland: Factors influencing outcome among 527 recent casesJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1998
- Physician and Hospital Factors Associated With Mortality of Surgical PatientsMedical Care, 1986
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979