Depositional environments of Upper Miocene (Messinian) evaporite deposits of the Sicilian Basin*
- 1 December 1976
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sedimentology
- Vol. 23 (6) , 729-760
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1976.tb00107.x
Abstract
In Sicily, Messinian evaporitic sedimentary deposits are developed under a wide variety of hypersaline conditions and in environments ranging from continental margin (subaerial), to basin‐margin supratidal, to intertidal, to subtidal and out into the hypersaline basin proper. The actual water depth at the time of deposition is indeterminate; however, relative terms such as ‘wave base’ and ‘photic zone’ are utilized. The inter‐fingering relationships of specific evaporitic facies having clear and recognizable physical characteristics are presented. These include sub‐aerial deposits of nodular calcium sulphate formed displacively within clastic sediments; gypsiferous rudites, arenites and arenitic marls, all of which are reworked sediments and are mixed in varying degrees with other clastic materials (subaerial, supratidal, and intertidal to deep basinal deposits). Laminated calcium sulphate alternating with very thin carbonate interlaminae and having two different aspects; one being even and continuous and the other of a wavy, irregular appearance (subtidal, intertidal, and supratidal deposits). Nodular calcium sulphate beds, usually associated with wavy, irregular laminated beds (supratidal, sabkha deposits); very coarsely crystalline gypsum beds (selenite), associated with more even, laminated beds (subaqueous, intertidal to subtidal deposits); wavy anastomozing gypsum beds, composed of very fine, often broken crystals (subaqueous, current‐swept deposits); halite having hopper and chevron structures (supratidal to intertidal); and halite, potash salts, etc. having continuous laminated structure (subaqueous, possibly basinal).Evidence for diagenetic changes is observed in the calcium sulphate deposits which apparently formed by tectonic stress and also by migrating hypersaline waters. These observations suggest that the common, massive form of alabastrine gypsum (or anhydrite, in the subsurface) may not always be ascribed to original depositional features, to syndiagenesis or to early diagenesis but may be the result of late diagenesis.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Messinian salinity crisis and its paleogeographical implicationsPalaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1976
- Depositional environments of Upper Miocene (Messinian) evaporites of Sicily as determined from analysis of intercalated carbonatesSedimentology, 1976
- A discussion and classification of subaqueous mass-transport with particular application to grain-flow, slurry-flow, and fluxoturbiditesEarth-Science Reviews, 1975
- Subaqueous evaporites of the Carboniferous Otto Fiord Formation, Canadian Arctic Archipelago: A summaryGeology, 1975
- An investigation of the factors which affect the size and growth rates of the habit faces of gypsumJournal of Crystal Growth, 1973
- THE DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF MARINE EVAPORITES: A CASE FOR SHALLOW, CLASTIC ACCUMULATIONSedimentology, 1971
- STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE SABKHA, ABU DHABI, PERSIAN GULFSedimentology, 1969
- Inverse Graded Bedding in Primary Gypsum of Chemical DepositionJournal of Sedimentary Research, 1955
- Turbidity currents and submarine slumps, and the 1929 Grand Banks [Newfoundland] earthquakeAmerican Journal of Science, 1952
- A metamorphic origin of seleniteAmerican Journal of Science, 1941