Bacterial filters protect anaesthetic equipment in a low‐flow system
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 48 (6) , 520-523
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07076.x
Abstract
Summary: We have recently described a low‐flow system with mechanical ventilation in which there was an open connection between the circle and ventilator. In the present study bacterial contamination and the role of bacterial filters at different points in the system were studied. Filters between the tracheal tube and circle are an effective barrier, but their absence did not increase contamination of either the circle or the ventilator. Some filters are also effective as heat and moisture exchangers if situated at the tracheal tube. Because of the lack of bacterial contamination, a prolonged interval between disinfection of the open connection and ventilator is acceptable, which reduces wear and costs.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanical ventilation during low‐flow anaesthesia. Experience with an alternative to the bag‐in‐bottleAnaesthesia, 1990
- Low–flow anaesthesia does not increase the risk of microbial contamination through the circle absorber systemActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1989
- Preservation of humidity and heat of respiratory gases during anaesthesia ‐ a laboratory investigationActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1987
- Methods of decontamination of anaesthetic equipment: daily sessional exchange of circuitsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1980
- The Anesthesia Machine and Circle System Are Not Likely to be Sources of Bacterial ContaminationAnesthesiology, 1977
- Bacterial FiltersInternational Anesthesiology Clinics, 1972
- Risk of Contamination from the Anesthesia Circle AbsorberAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1969
- The Williams bacterial filter.Anaesthesia, 1967
- PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA CROSS-INFECTIONThe Lancet, 1965
- Anaesthetic machines and cross-infectionAnaesthesia, 1962