Dilemmas In Regulation Of The Market For Pharmaceuticals
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 22 (3) , 31-41
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.31
Abstract
What can be learned from international experience of efforts to control spending and to improve efficiency and access in pharmaceutical markets? Policymakers tend to reinvent many policies to control the behavior of patients, doctors, and industry, despite a lack of evidence of those policies’ cost-effectiveness. There is an emerging consensus that reimbursement in public and private health care systems should be informed by evidence of the cost-effectiveness of treatments and that utilization should be constrained by budget caps and information systems. Whatever the policy chosen, evaluation is as essential as it is rare.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy, safety, and cost of new anticancer drugsBMJ, 2002
- Europe on the brink of direct-to-consumer drug advertisingThe Lancet, 2002
- Just how tainted has medicine become?The Lancet, 2002
- Direct-to-Consumer Advertising — Strengthening Our Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs: what are Americans being sold?The Lancet, 2001
- Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources?BMJ, 2001
- Evidence-based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choicesThe Lancet, 1997
- Lessons from international experience in controlling pharmaceutical expenditure III: regulating industryBMJ, 1996
- Patient charges and the utilisation of nhs prescription medicines: Some estimates using a cointegration procedureHealth Economics, 1995
- Effects of Limiting Medicaid Drug-Reimbursement Benefits on the Use of Psychotropic Agents and Acute Mental Health Services by Patients with SchizophreniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994