The Role of Rapid vs Conventional Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing for Inpatients
- 26 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 165 (17) , 1956-1960
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.17.1956
Abstract
Research from JAMA Internal Medicine — The Role of Rapid vs Conventional Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing for Inpatients — Effects on Quality of CareThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for HIV in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Expanded Screening for HIV in the United States — An Analysis of Cost-EffectivenessNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Outcomes of Offering Rapid Point-of-Care HIV Testing in A Sexually Transmitted Disease ClinicJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2005
- Comparison of point-of-care rapid HIV testing in three clinical venuesAIDS, 2004
- Rapid HIV-1 Testing During LaborA Multicenter StudyJAMA, 2004
- HIV Infection: Point-of-Care TestingAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2004
- Emergency Department–Based HIV Screening and Counseling: Experience With Rapid and Standard Serologic TestingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- On-site, rapid HIV testing with same-day results and counselingAIDS, 1997
- Staging system for clinical AIDS patientsThe Lancet, 1995
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987