Duloxetine vs placebo in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a four‐continent randomized clinical trial
- 4 February 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 93 (3) , 311-318
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04607.x
Abstract
To further assess, in a phase 3 study, treatment with duloxetine for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in other geographical regions, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Finland, Poland, South Africa and Spain, as previous trials in North America and Europe provided evidence for the safety and efficacy of duloxetine as a pharmacological treatment for SUI in women. The study included 458 women aged 27-79 years enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients with predominantly SUI were identified using a validated clinical algorithm. They were randomly assigned to receive placebo (231) or duloxetine 40 mg twice daily (227) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome variables included the incontinence episode frequency (IEF) and the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire. Van Elteren's test was used to analyse the percentage changes in IEF where the stratification variable was weekly baseline IEF (IEF < 14 and > or = 14). Analysis of covariance was used to analyse I-QOL scores. The mean baseline IEF was 18.4/week; 55% of patients had a baseline IEF of > or = 14. There was a significantly greater median decrease in IEF with duloxetine with placebo (54% vs 40%, P = 0.05), with comparable significant improvements in quality of life (I-QOL score increases of 10.3 vs 6.4, P = 0.007). The improvements with duloxetine were associated with significantly greater increases in voiding intervals than with placebo (20.4 vs 8.5 min, P < 0.001). The placebo response was 10.7% and 12.5% higher than those reported in two European and North American phase 3 trials. This may have been related to more patients being naïve for incontinence management in the current trial. Discontinuation rates for adverse events were 1.7% for placebo and 17.2% for duloxetine (P < 0.001), with nausea being the most common reason for discontinuation (3.1%); it was the most common adverse event with duloxetine, but was mild or moderate in most (81%), did not worsen in any patient and resolved within 7 days in 60% and within 1 month in 86% of continuing patients; 88% of women who experienced nausea while taking duloxetine completed the trial. These results show improvements in incontinence and quality of life with duloxetine 40 mg twice daily for 12 weeks that are in keeping with those reported in two other recently completed phase 3 trials in Europe and North America.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocking agent thymoxamine on the neurogenic bladder and urethraActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 2009
- The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub‐committee of the International Continence SocietyNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2002
- Serotonergic modulation of spinal ascending activity and sacral reflex activity evoked by pelvic nerve stimulation in catsBrain Research, 1998
- Definition of overactive bladder and epidemiology of urinary incontinenceUrology, 1997
- Spinal 5‐HT2 receptor‐mediated facilitation of pudendal nerve reflexes in the anaesthetized catBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1996
- Effect of 5-HT receptor and adrenoceptor antagonists on micturition in conscious catsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1992
- α2-Adrenoceptors not imidazole receptors mediate depression of a sacral spinal reflex in the catEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1991
- Unmasking of a neonatal somatovesical reflex in adult cats by the serotonin autoreceptor agonist 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamineDevelopmental Brain Research, 1990
- Experimental Evidence for a Central Nervous system Site of Action in the Effect of Alpha-Adrenergic Blockers on the External Urinary SphincterJournal of Urology, 1984
- Effects of clonidine on the lumbar sympathetic pathways to the large intestine and urinary bladder of the catEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1979