Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study
Top Cited Papers
- 30 October 2007
- Vol. 335 (7628) , 1025
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55
Abstract
Objective To assess the risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery.Design Prospective cohort study within the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health.Setting 410 health facilities in 24 areas in eight randomly selected Latin American countries; 123 were randomly selected and 120 participated and provided dataParticipants 106 546 deliveries reported during the three month study period, with data available for 97 095 (91% coverage).Main outcome measures Maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with intrapartum or elective caesarean delivery, adjusted for clinical, demographic, pregnancy, and institutional characteristics.Results Women undergoing caesarean delivery had an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with women undergoing vaginal delivery (odds ratio 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.5) for intrapartum caesarean and 2.3 (1.7 to 3.1) for elective caesarean). The risk of antibiotic treatment after delivery for women having either type of caesarean was five times that of women having vaginal deliveries. With cephalic presentation, there was a trend towards a reduced odds ratio for fetal death with elective caesarean, after adjustment for possible confounding variables and gestational age (0.7, 0.4 to 1.0). With breech presentation, caesarean delivery had a large protective effect for fetal death. With cephalic presentation, however, independent of possible confounding variables and gestational age, intrapartum and elective caesarean increased the risk for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care (2.1 (1.8 to 2.6) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3), respectively) and the risk of neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge (1.7 (1.3 to 2.2) and 1.9 (1.5 to 2.6), respectively), which remained higher even after exclusion of all caesarean deliveries for fetal distress. Such increased risk was not seen for breech presentation. Lack of labour was a risk factor for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge for babies delivered by elective caesarean delivery, but rupturing of membranes may be protective.Conclusions Caesarean delivery independently reduces overall risk in breech presentations and risk of intrapartum fetal death in cephalic presentations but increases the risk of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in cephalic presentations.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maternal Outcomes Associated With Planned Primary Cesarean Births Compared With Planned Vaginal BirthsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2005Pediatrics, 2007
- Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Caesarean section on demand: Influence of personal birth experience and working environment on attitude of German gynaecologistsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2005
- Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwiferyBMJ, 2005
- The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinenceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Intrapartum Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Previously Unrecognized Clinical EntityObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Ethical Dimensions of Elective Primary Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2000