“Near” and “far” in language and perception
- 9 November 1999
- Vol. 73 (1) , 35-63
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00040-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachronyLinguistic Typology, 1999
- Spatial representations for action in parietal cortexCognitive Brain Research, 1996
- Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near spaceNeuropsychologia, 1994
- 'What' and 'where' in the human brainCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 1994
- Sound symbolism in proximal and distal formsLinguistics, 1991
- Heterogeneity of extrastriate visual areas and multiple parietal areas in the Macaque monkeyNeuropsychologia, 1991
- The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, 1990
- The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in manNeuropsychologia, 1986
- CZECH DEICTICS: PRONOUNS AND ARTICLES?Linguistics, 1972
- Iste Deiktikon in the Early Roman DramatistsTransactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 1946