Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs Direct stenting In Coronary Treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial)
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 88 (12) , 1364-1369
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02114-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteriesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteriesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- A randomized study of direct coronary stent delivery compared with stenting after predilatation: The NIR future trialCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2000
- Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Evaluation of scaffolding effects of five different types of stents by intravascular ultrasound analysisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the multilink stentThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- Endogenous Cell SeedingCirculation, 1996
- Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stentJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991