Analysis of variations in contrast‐detail experiments
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 11 (4) , 469-473
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595539
Abstract
Three sources of variability in a contrast‐detail (CD) experiment have been quantitated: within‐observer variance, between‐observer variance, and sample variance. It is concluded that (1) it is more efficient to increase the numbers of replicated images and observers than to increase the number of readings; (2) sampling and between‐observer variations are approximately equal; (3) one can expect approximately 10% standard errors in the measured value of threshold detail or threshold contrast in a CD experiment which employs four observers, four replicate image samples, and one reading per observer.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.Radiology, 1984
- Contrast-detail-Dose and dose efficiency analysis of a scanning digital and a screen-film-grid radiographic systemMedical Physics, 1981
- Dose efficiency and the effects of resolution and noise on detail perceptibility in radiographic magnificationMedical Physics, 1981
- Effect of reduced scatter on radiographic information content and patient exposure: A quantitative demonstrationMedical Physics, 1980
- The Use of Contrast-Detail-Dose Evaluation of Image Quality in a Computed Tomographic ScannerJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1979
- Contrast-Detail-Dose Analysis of Six Different Computed Tomographic ScannersJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1979
- The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomographyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1978
- The Sensitivity Performance of the Human Eye on an Absolute Scale*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1948