Head and Neck Melanoma in 534 Clinical Stage I Patients
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 200 (6) , 769-775
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198412000-00017
Abstract
Single and multifactorial analyses were used to evaluate prognosis and results of surgical treatment in 534 clinical stage I patients with head and neck cutaneous melanoma. This computerized data base was prospectively accumulated in over 90% of cases. Melanomas were about equally distributed between men and women. They were located on the skin of the face in 47%, neck in 27%, scalp in 13% and the ear in 13% of patients. Both the results of the prognostic factors analyses and the surgical treatment demonstrated that lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) was distinct from the other 2 growth patterns, superficial spreading melanoma and nodular melanoma (SSM and NM). In a multifactorial analysis of the 453 patients with SSM and NM, the dominant prognostic variables were tumor thickness (P < 0.00001), anatomic subsite (P = 0.0213) and ulceration (P = 0.0289). Patients with melanomas on the scalp or neck subsites fared worse than those with tumors located on the face or ear. The results differed for LMM, where thickness was not a significant predictor of survival, and the most dominant prognostic variable was ulceration (P = 0.0042). Local recurrence rates were low, being 2.4% for tumors < 2.5 mm in thickness, but were 12.3% for tumors .gtoreq. 4.0 mm in thickness. Patients with SSM and NM lesions located on the head and neck had a lower survival rate than those with extremity melanomas in every tumor thickness category, although only those in the 0.76 to 1.49 mm thickness subgroup were significantly different (P = 0.0007). After 5 yr of follow-up, patients who underwent an elective lymph node dissection for SSM and NM with a thickness range of 1.5-3.99 mm had a better survival (72%) than patients with melanomas of equivalent thickness whose initial treatment was wide excision alone (45%). LMM had a less aggressive biologic behavior compared to SSM or NM and was treated more conservatively. LMM lesions had an 85% 10-yr survival rate with wide excision only, and there was no significant improvement in survival with ELND [elective regional lymph node dissection]. Growth patterns, tumor thickness, ulceration and anatomic subsites should be considered when evaluating risk foctors and when making treatment decisions in head and nek melanoma patients.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Melanoma of the head and neck in queenslandHead & Neck Surgery, 1982
- A Comparison of Prognostic Factors and Surgical Results in 1,786 Patients with Localized (Stage I) Melanoma Treated in Alabama, USA, and New South Wales, AustraliaAnnals of Surgery, 1982
- Ulceration and prognosis in cutaneous malignant melanomaHistopathology, 1982
- Prognostic Factors for Melanoma Patients with Lesions 0.76–1.69 mm in Thickness An Appraisal of “Thin” Level IV LesionsAnnals of Surgery, 1982
- Selective Surgical Management of Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and NeckAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- A Multifactorial Analysis of MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1978
- Inefficacy of Immediate Node Dissection in Stage 1 Melanoma of the LimbsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Results of Treatment of 269 Patients with Primary Cutaneous MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1977
- Tumor thickness and lymphocytic infiltration in malignant melanoma of the head and neckThe American Journal of Surgery, 1974
- Malignant melanoma of the skin of the head and neckThe American Journal of Surgery, 1970