DOCUMENTATION NOTES
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Documentation
- Vol. 36 (1) , 24-32
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026689
Abstract
The merits and demerits of existing techniques for the selection of journals are discussed. This discussion brings out the fact that the use of journals characterizes their importance. A model for the ideal selection of journals is presented. A canon of decreasing usefulness is invoked to determine journal priorities and to formulate guidelines for selection. The highest priority in the matter of journal selection should be given to those journals which are highly cited, abstracted, and used.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Statistical Procedure for Evaluating the Importance of Scientific PapersThe Library Quarterly, 1977
- Significant journals of scienceNature, 1976
- CITATION ANALYSES AS INDICATORS OF THE USE OF SERIALS: A COMPARISON OF RANKED TITLE LISTS PRODUCED BY CITATION COUNTING AND FROM USE DATAJournal of Documentation, 1976
- Practical Interpretation of Citation and Library Use StudiesCollege & Research Libraries, 1975
- CITATION ANALYSISJournal of Documentation, 1975
- BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A NEW RESEARCH SUB‐FIELDJournal of Documentation, 1974
- Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal EvaluationScience, 1972
- College Libraries and Chemical EducationScience, 1927