Are Children with Autism Deaf to Gricean Maxims?
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
- Vol. 1 (1) , 55-72
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135468096396703
Abstract
Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK High-functioning children with autism show a severe deficit in the development of pragmatics whereas their knowledge of syntax and morphology is relatively intact. In this study we investigated further their selective communication impairment by comparing them with children with specific language impairment (SLI) and normally developing children. We used a pragmatic task that involved the detection of utterances that violate conversational maxims (avoid redundancy, be informative, truthful, relevant, and polite). Most children with autism performed at chance on this task, whereas all children with SLI and all normal controls performed above chance. In addition, the success of children with autism on the pragmatics task was related to their ability to attribute false beliefs. These results are consistent with the idea that communication deficits in autism result from a selective impairment in representing propositional attitudes. Their implications for domain-specific views of cognitive development are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Children's ambiguous utterances: a re-examination of processing limitations on productionJournal of Child Language, 1995
- ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- Annotation: Current Psychological Theories of Autism: The “Theory of Mind” Account and Rival TheoriesJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1994
- Pragmatic impairments in adults with childhood diagnoses of autism or developmental receptive language disorderJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1993
- The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: autismTrends in Neurosciences, 1991
- Do children exploit the Maxim of Antecedent in order to interpret ambiguous descriptions?Journal of Child Language, 1991
- Conversational characteristics of children with semantic‐pragmatic disorder. II: What features lead to a judgement of inappropriacy?International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 1989
- Children's use of conversational rules in a referential communication taskJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1987
- Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?Cognition, 1985
- A COMPARISON OF THE LANGUAGE OF PSYCHOTIC AND NON‐PSYCHOTIC CHILDREN WHO ARE MENTALLY RETARDEDJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1968