Selective impairment of baroreflex-mediated vasoconstrictor responses in patients with ventricular dysfunction.
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 69 (3) , 451-460
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.69.3.451
Abstract
Cardiac dysfunction in animals has been associated with impairment of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of the circulation. Chronic heart failure in human beings is associated with neurohumoral excitation, which could result in part from impairment in the inhibitory influence of baroreflexes. We postulated that (1) patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) have impaired baroreflex modulation of vascular resistance and (2) administration of a digitalis glycoside would immediately restore baroreflex sensitivity. Eleven patients with LVD (NYHA class, 2.8 +/- 0.2, mean +/- SEM; baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, 18 +/- 2%; cardiac index, 2.4 +/- 0.21/min/m2; and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 26.0 +/- 3.2 mm Hg) were compared with 17 normal control subjects. We measured forearm vasoconstrictor responses to simulated orthostatic stress with use of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -10 and -40 mm Hg to unload cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors. Baseline forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was higher in patients with LVD than in normal subjects: FVRLVD, 68.8 +/- 15.3 U; FVRN, 23.2 +/- 2.1 U (p less than .001). During unloading of baroreceptors with LBNP -10 mm Hg, normal subjects developed vasoconstriction (delta VRN at LBNP -10 mm Hg, +5.7 +/- 1.6 U) but patients with LVD failed to have vasoconstriction and tended to develop vasodilation (delta FVRLVD at LBNP -10 mm Hg, -8.6 +/- 8.5 U) (p = .05, normals vs patients with LVD at LBNP -10 mm Hg). A more marked disparity in response was seen during unloading of baroreceptors of LBNP -40 mm Hg: delta FVRN at LBNP -40 mm Hg, +16.6 +/- 1.5 U; delta FVRLVD at LBNP -40 mm Hg, -10.3 +/- 9.6 U (p less than .001, normals vs patients with LVD). Despite high baseline values for FVR, patients with LVD developed vasoconstriction during intra-arterial infusions of norepinephrine, thereby excluding a nonspecific depression of vascular reactivity as the mechanism for abnormal responses to LBNP in patients with LVD. We also studied the short-term effects of administration of a digitalis glycoside, ouabain 0.0075 mg/kg (seven patients) or lanatoside C (Cedilanid-D) 0.02 mg/kg (three patients), on baroreflex-mediated vasoconstrictor responses to LBNP in the patients with LVD. Digitalis glycoside reduced baseline FVR from 71.8 +/- 16.6 to 48.6 +/- 12.0 U (p less than .02). Responses to LBNP tended to be normalized after administration of digitalis glycoside: delta FVR during LBNP -40 mm Hg, -11.1 +/- 10.5 U before and +7.8 +/- 5.6 U after the drug (p less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increased plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with congestive heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Regional blood flow response to orthostasis in patients with congestive heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Neurohumoral control mechanisms in congestive heart failureAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Plasma norepinephrine in congestive heart failurePublished by Elsevier ,1978
- The Mechanism of Adaptation of Left Atrial Stretch Receptors in Dogs with Chronic Congestive Heart FailureJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1977
- Reflex control of the peripheral circulationProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1976
- The role of low pressure baroreceptors in reflex vasoconstrictor responses in manJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1972
- Increased Activity in Left Ventricular Receptors during Hemorrhage or Occlusion of Caval Veins in the Cat. ‐ A Possible Cause of the Vaso‐vagal ReactionActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1972
- Alterations in the Baroreceptor Reflex in Conscious Dogs with Heart FailureJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1972
- Forearm Venous Responses to Stimulation of Adrenergic Receptors*Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1965