Prey preference and reproductive success of the generalist predatorOrius laevigatus
- 1 April 2002
- Vol. 97 (1) , 116-124
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970112.x
Abstract
In theory, selection favours predators that select prey in order to maximise reproductive success. We studied the association between preference and performance of the generalist predatorOrius laevigatuswith respect to two prey species: spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) and western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). Under ample prey supply, the predators had higher maximum reproductive success (measured as intrinsic population growth rater) on thrips than on spider mites; hence thrips represent a higher prey quality to the bugs. This was at odds with the observed preference of the predatory bug for plants (patches) with high densities of spider mites to plants with moderate densities of thrips in release‐recapture experiments. Thus, prey quality does not suffice to explain the preference of predators for plants with prey. The quality of a patch as an oviposition site (i.e. the number of eggs produced on a patch per bug per day) also did not match preference patterns. Hence, patch preference was not correlated to prey quality or oviposition rate on prey patches. However, patch productivity, i.e. the total number of offspring surviving until adulthood that can be produced by one female on a patch, was correlated with preference. This was further tested by offering the predators a choice between plants with high densities of spider mites and plants with high densities of thrips in an independent set of release‐recapture experiments. These two types of prey patches were found equivalent in terms of patch productivity. Indeed, the predators showed no preference for either of the two types of patches, which is in agreement with our predictions. This suggests that the predatory bugs select patches based on patch productivity rather than on prey quality or oviposition rate on a patch.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attraction of a generalist predator towards herbivore‐infested plantsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1999
- Essential versus alternative foods of insect predators: benefits of a mixed dietOecologia, 1999
- THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN PLANTS AND PREY FOR AN OMNIVOROUS INSECTEcology, 1999
- Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different qualityOecologia, 1999
- Odour-Mediated Avoidance of Competition in Drosophila parasitoids: The Ghost of CompetitionOikos, 1995
- Leaf age affects composition of herbivore-induced synomones and attraction of predatory mitesJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1994
- Food Plant Choice of Pieris Butterflies as a Trade‐Off between Parasitoid Avoidance and Quality of PlantsEcology, 1994
- How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the PhytoseiidaeExperimental and Applied Acarology, 1992
- Self-Selection of Optimal Diets by InsectsAnnual Review of Entomology, 1991
- Do phytoseiid mites select the best prey species in terms of reproductive success?Experimental and Applied Acarology, 1990