Book‐to‐Market Equity, Distress Risk, and Stock Returns
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 57 (5) , 2317-2336
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00497
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between book‐to‐market equity, distress risk, and stock returns. Among firms with the highest distress risk as proxied by Ohlson's (1980) O‐score, the difference in returns between high and low book‐to market securities is more than twice as large as that in other firms. This large return differential cannot be explained by the three‐factor model or by differences in economic fundamentals. Consistent with mispricing arguments, firms with high distress risk exhibit the largest return reversals around earnings announcements, and the book‐to‐market effect is largest in small firms with low analyst coverage.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are the Fama and French Factors Global or Country Specific?The Review of Financial Studies, 2002
- Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage, and the Profitability of Momentum StrategiesThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Conditioning Variables and the Cross Section of Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Industry costs of equityPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Is the Risk of Bankruptcy a Systematic Risk?The Journal of Finance, 1998
- Another Look at the Cross‐section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Size and Book‐to‐Market Factors in Earnings and ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Long‐Run Performance of initial Public OfferingsThe Journal of Finance, 1991