Natural Versus Artificial Sensors Applied in Peroneal Nerve Stimulation
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Artificial Organs
- Vol. 21 (3) , 227-231
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb04655.x
Abstract
We have attempted to quantify the performance of natural versus artificial sensors when used in a closed-loop functional electrical stimulation system. Peroneal nerve stimulation was applied during gait to a multiple sclerosis subject with a drop foot. Stimulation was applied only during the swing phase to provide artificially induced dorsiflexion of the foot. Detection of the onset of the stance phase was accomplished using a standard heel contact switch mounted inside the subject's shoe (the artificial sensor) and using processed nerve signals derived from an implanted nerve-cuff electrode (the natural sensor). A detection percentage of at least 85% was achieved using the afferent nerve signal information only. When muscle activity (also recorded in the cuff) and additional information about the gait cycle were incorporated, functional detection ratios approaching 100% were achieved.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Real-time digital signal processing of electroneurographic signalsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- Instrumentation for ENG and EMG recordings in FES systemsIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1994
- A spiral nerve cuff electrode for peripheral nerve stimulationIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1988