Factors Associated With Residual Breast Cancer After Re-excision for Close or Positive Margins
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 11 (10) , 915-920
- https://doi.org/10.1245/aso.2004.12.037
Abstract
Background: Successful breast conservation surgery (BCS) requires complete tumor excision. Margin status of the initial specimen determines the need for additional surgery. We explored factors associated with residual cancer (RC) upon follow-up surgery in patients with close, positive, or undetermined margins following BCS. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 276 patients with initial close, positive, or undetermined margins who underwent re-excision (RE) or mastectomy was conducted. All initial excisions were intended as definitive procedures. Chi-square analysis was used to identify factors that may predict RC. Results: Of 276 patients, 87 had close, 168 had positive, and 21 had undetermined margins on initial excision. Of this group, 63% (175/276) had RC upon RE or mastectomy. Of positive-margin patients, 68% had RC, compared with 53% of close-margin and 67% of undetermined-margin patients (P = .006). Tumors ≥2 cm were more often associated with RC than smaller tumors (70.8% vs. 56.5%; P = .07). This association was strongest in positive-margin patients (P = .04). High tumor grade was associated with RC in all groups. RC linearly increased with the number of involved margins (P = .02). Specimen inking with multiple colors was associated with decreased risk of RC (P = .004). Conclusions: Over half of patients with involved or undetermined margins had RC upon RE or mastectomy. Positive and undetermined margins were more often associated with RC than close margins. Larger tumor size was associated with RC in patients with positive. Increasing tumor grade suggests a greater chance of detecting RC in all groups. Multiple involved margins led to a greater risk of RC.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Significance of Margins of Excision on Breast Cancer RecurrenceAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastCancer, 2002
- Positive margins of breast biopsy: Is reexcision always necessary?Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1999
- Relationship Between the Size and Margin Status of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and Residual DiseaseJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burdenInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Factors associated with a positive reexcision after excisional biopsy for invasive breast cancerSurgery, 1995
- Incidence of Gross and Microscopic Carcinoma in Specimens from Patients with Breast Cancer After Re-Excision LumpectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Five-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy and Segmental Mastectomy with or without Radiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985