SOME EFFECTS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN RESPONSE‐CONTINGENT SHOCK AND REINFORCEMENT1
- 1 May 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 10 (3) , 301-309
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-301
Abstract
Rats responded on a two-component chain schedule in which a response-contingent electric shock at the end of the first component was either positively correlated, negatively correlated, or uncorrelated with reinforcement availability in the second component. With 0.4-ma shocks, rate in the first component depended on the shock-reinforcement correlation: when shock and reinforcement availability were positively correlated, after extended exposure to the contingencies, rates exceeded those in the absence of shock; when shock and reinforcement availability were negatively correlated, responding was generally suppressed throughout. The discriminative control of shock over responding in the second component, in which reinforcement was available 50% of the time, also depended somewhat on correlation. However, rate change in the first component was not specifically related to discrimination in the second component. With 0.8-ma shocks, responding was substantially suppressed in the first component at all three values of shock-reinforcement correlations.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Counter conditioning in an operant conflict situation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966
- Two parameters of conditioned reinforcement in a chaining situation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964
- A REVIEW OF POSITIVE CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962
- INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE DISCRIMINATIVE AND AVERSIVE PROPERTIES OF PUNISHMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962
- DISCRIMINATIVE PROPERTIES OF PUNISHMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961