Age-related changes in antisaccade task performance: Inhibitory control or working-memory engagement?
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Brain and Cognition
- Vol. 56 (2) , 177-188
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.077
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining Neurocognitive Aging: Is One Factor Enough?Brain and Cognition, 2002
- Working Memory and the Suppression of Reflexive SaccadesJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2002
- Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap.Psychology and Aging, 2001
- Aging and the Ranschburg effect: No evidence of reduced response suppression in old age.Psychology and Aging, 2000
- Working memory and aging: Deficit or strategy differences?Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 1997
- Initiation and Inhibition of Saccadic Eye Movements in Younger and Older Adults an Analysis of the Gap EffectThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 1997
- Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity: More Evidence for a General Capacity TheoryMemory, 1996
- A Resource Account of InhibitionPsychological Science, 1995
- Visual offsets facilitate saccadic latency: Does predisengagement of visuospatial attention mediate this gap effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1993
- Effects of Components of Displacement-Step Stimuli Upon Latency for Saccadic Eye MovementJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1967