Why don't family measures of cohesion and control behave the way they're supposed to?
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Journal of Family Therapy
- Vol. 18 (1) , 5-18
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189008250788
Abstract
This paper examines the difficulties in family assessment research with the two central constructs of cohesion and control. First the status of these constructs in the literature is reviewed, including evidence for their convergent and discriminant validity. Then problems stemming from unarticulated theory, inadequate definitions, and lack of fit between definitions and instrumentation are described. Following this critique, a conceptual reappraisal of the constructs of cohesion and control is offered, based on the family FIRO model, and a framework for making sense of the problems encountered thus far in assessing these domains of family interaction is suggested.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of self-report measures of two family dimensions: Control and cohesionThe American Journal of Family Therapy, 1988
- Family Cohesion And Control: A Multitrait‐Multimethod Study*Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1987
- Family Structure and StressFamily Process, 1986
- A Factor Analysis of Self‐Report Measures of Family FunctioningFamily Process, 1985
- Struggling with Congruence Across Theoretical Models and MethodsFamily Process, 1985
- REJOINDER: COUNTERPERSPECTIVES ON FAMILY MEASUREMENT: CLARIFYING THE PRAGMATIC INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH METHODSFamily Process, 1985
- The Epigenesis Of Relational Systems: A Model For Understanding Family DevelopmentFamily Process, 1984
- Family Concepts and Their Measurement: Things Are Seldom What They SeemFamily Process, 1984
- Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: Vl. Theoretical UpdateFamily Process, 1983
- A Methodological Study of Family Cohesion and Adaptability*Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1980