Pictorial Mnemonic Strategies for Special Education
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Special Education Technology
- Vol. 6 (3) , 24-33
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016264348300600304
Abstract
Recently, the associative learning of exceptional children has been found to be greatly facilitated by the use of pictorial mnemonic strategies. This paper reviews the use of such strategies as an instructional tool for both nonhandicapped and handicapped learners. Recent research has indicated that (a) mildly handicapped learners can sucessfully employ fairly complex mnemonic strategies, and (b) mnemonic strategies can be adapted to many different content areas. In this research, students taught to use mnemonic strategies have consistently outperformed students taught using direct instruction and free-study techniques. Implications for the improved learning and retention of school content by exceptional students are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Different Prose-Learning Variations of the Mnemonic Keyword MethodAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1984
- Verbal Rehearsal and Visual ImageryJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
- A Concrete Strategy for Remembering Abstract ProseAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1983
- The Mnemonic Keyword MethodReview of Educational Research, 1982
- Mnemonic Versus Nonmnemonic Vocabulary-learning Strategies for ChildrenAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1982
- Mnemonic Devices: Classification, Characteristics, and CriteriaReview of Educational Research, 1981
- The Keyword Method in the Classroom: How to Remember the States and Their CapitalsThe Elementary School Journal, 1980
- Recent Research on Visual Mnemonics: Historical Roots and Educational FruitsReview of Educational Research, 1979
- Pictures, imagery, and retarded children's prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978
- Imagery and Children’s Learning: Putting the Picture in Developmental PerspectiveReview of Educational Research, 1977