Registries and Registration of Clinical Trials
- 29 December 2005
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 353 (26) , 2811-2812
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme058280
Abstract
The arguments in favor of the registration of clinical trials are now familiar.1-4 Chief among these addresses the practice of selective reporting, whereby negative or detrimental studies are not brought into the public domain, which experts on the subject of clinical trials consider an important form of scientific misconduct.5 This practice, as illustrated in a number of high-profile examples, have increased the demand for the mandatory public registration of clinical trials. Registration of trials should improve the completeness, reliability, and quality of the interpretation of clinical research.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Is This Clinical Trial Fully Registered? — A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal EditorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials: A Delphi surveyContemporary Clinical Trials, 2005
- WHO facilitates international collaboration in setting standards for clinical trial registrationThe Lancet, 2005
- Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal EditorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished dataThe Lancet, 2004
- Registering Clinical TrialsJAMA, 2003
- A clinical trials register for EuropeBMJ, 2002
- Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986