Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 10 (7) , 571-578
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013138911638
Abstract
The aim of this study is to show the relationship between test-retest reproducibility and responsiveness and to introduce the smallest real difference (SRD) approach, using the sickness impact...Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Measuring quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke: a feasibility study of four questionnaires in The Netherlands.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- Sensitivity of Sickness Impact Profile Items to Measure Change Over Time in a Low-back Pain Patient GroupSpine, 1993
- Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the Sickness Impact ProfileDisability and Rehabilitation, 1993
- Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patientsPain, 1992
- Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluationControlled Clinical Trials, 1991
- Acupressure therapy for morning sickness A controlled clinical trialJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1989
- Comparative Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile and Shorter Scales for Functional Assessment in Low-Back PainSpine, 1986
- Measuring Health in Rheumatic Disorders by Means of a Swedish Version of the Sickness Impact Profile: Results from a Population StudyScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1985
- Measuring Physical and Psychosocial Function in Patients with Low-Back PainSpine, 1983