An Evaluation of Procedures for Computing an Ability—Achievement Discrepancy Score
- 1 May 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 17 (5) , 262-266
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948401700502
Abstract
The most common strategy for identifying children with learning disabilities has been to search for a discrepancy between ability and achievement. The need to determine a severe discrepancy has prompted the development of more than a dozen procedures for assessing the magnitude or statistical significance of ability—achievement discrepancy scores. Nine such procedures dealing only with magnitude were evaluated and found to possess one or more serious statistical deficiencies. The approach with the greatest potential involves first assessing the statistical significance (reliability) of a discrepancy score and then estimating the discriminative efficiency (validity) of that score. The utility of this approach, however, has not yet been tested by local and state educational agencies.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The fallacy of “two years below grade level for age” as a diagnostic criterion for reading disordersJournal of School Psychology, 1982
- An Evaluation of the Regression Discrepancy Method for Identifying Children With Learning DisabilitiesThe Journal of Special Education, 1980
- Determining Learning Disabilities in MathematicsAcademic Therapy, 1979
- The Z-Score Discrepancy Method for Identifying Reading Disabled ChildrenJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1975
- Use of Deficits to Identify the Learning DisabledExceptional Children, 1973
- A Note on the Use of Confidence Bands to Evaluate the Reliability of a Difference between Two ScoresAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1967
- Statistics for the investigation of individual casesJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1957