How not to clarify concepts in nursing
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 24 (3) , 572-576
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22618.x
Abstract
Concept analysis and conceptual clarification form an identifiable genre within the nursing literature, with most recent examples drawing on the model proposed by Walker & Avant (1988). This paper argues that the Walker & Avant model is based on untenable assumptions, and that the writings of those who adopt it inevitably contain a serious flaw that vitiates the procedure and renders the results arbitrary. In particular, the relationship between concept and theory, a topic to which the philosophy of science has devoted much attention, has been misunderstood by these authors. Concepts are not the 'building blocks' of theory, but the niches created by theory; and any 'conceptual clarification' that anticipates theoretical commitment becomes a vacuous exercise in semantics.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expert: a discussion of the implications of the concept as used in nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- Feminism: a concept analysisJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1993
- Intuition as a function of the expert nurse: a critique of Benner's novice to expert modelJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1993
- Mobility: a concept analysisJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1993
- Quality of life: a concept analysisJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1993
- An analysis of the concept of experienceJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1991
- Power: a concept analysisJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1991
- The concept of reassurance in nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1989
- Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycleJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1989
- FROM NOVICE TO EXPERTThe American Journal of Nursing, 1984