Endogenous GluR1‐containing AMPA receptors translocate to asymmetric synapses in the lateral amygdala during the early phase of fear memory formation: An electron microscopic immunocytochemical study
- 26 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Vol. 518 (23) , 4723-4739
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22472
Abstract
Although glutamate receptor 1 (GluR1)‐containing α‐amino‐3‐hydroxyl‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazole‐propionate receptors (GluR1‐AMPARs) are implicated in synaptic plasticity, it has yet to be demonstrated whether endogenous GluR1‐AMPARs undergo activity‐dependent trafficking in vivo to synapses to support short‐term memory (STM) formation. The paradigm of pavlovian fear conditioning (FC) can be used to address this question, because a discrete region—the lateral amygdala (LA)—has been shown unambiguously to be necessary for the formation of the associative memory between a neutral stimulus (tone [CS]) and a noxious stimulus (foot shock [US]). Acquisition of STM for FC can occur even in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors, indicating that redistribution of pre‐existing molecules to synaptic junctions underlies STM. We employed electron microscopic immunocytochemistry to evaluate alterations in the distribution of endogenous AMPAR subunits at LA synapses during the STM phase of FC. Rats were sacrificed 40 minutes following three CS‐US pairings. In the LA of paired animals, relative to naïve animals, the proportion of GluR1‐AMPAR‐labeled synapses increased 99% at spines and 167% in shafts. In the LA of unpaired rats, for which the CS was never associated with the US, GluR1 immunoreactivity decreased 84% at excitatory shaft synapses. GluR2/3 immunoreactivity at excitatory synapses did not change detectably following paired or unpaired conditioning. Thus, the early phase of FC involves rapid redistribution specifically of the GluR1‐AMPARs to the postsynaptic membranes in the LA, together with the rapid translocation of GluR1‐AMPARs from remote sites into the spine head cytoplasm, yielding behavior changes that are specific to stimulus contingencies. J. Comp. Neurol. 518:4723–4739, 2010.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postsynaptic Mechanisms Govern the Differential Excitation of Cortical Neurons by Thalamic InputsJournal of Neuroscience, 2009
- The Immediate Early GeneArc/Arg3.1: Regulation, Mechanisms, and FunctionJournal of Neuroscience, 2008
- Dopaminergic innervation of interneurons in the rat basolateral amygdalaNeuroscience, 2008
- Estrogen and aging affect synaptic distribution of phosphorylated LIM kinase (pLIMK) in CA1 region of female rat hippocampusNeuroscience, 2008
- Distribution of NMDA and AMPA receptor subunits at thalamo-amygdaloid dendritic spinesBrain Research, 2007
- Arc/Arg3.1 Interacts with the Endocytic Machinery to Regulate AMPA Receptor TraffickingPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Arc/Arg3.1 Mediates Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling of AMPA ReceptorsNeuron, 2006
- Synaptically released zinc gates long-term potentiation in fear conditioning pathwaysProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Activity-induced targeting of profilin and stabilization of dendritic spine morphologyNature Neuroscience, 2003
- Subunit-specific temporal and spatial patterns of AMPA receptor exocytosis in hippocampal neuronsNature Neuroscience, 2001