Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done
- 26 November 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 6 (4) , 232-235
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12072
Abstract
Systematic reviews are researches requiring great attention to detail. They may well necessitate considerable investment of effort to ensure relevant data are identified, extracted, synthesized, written up and disseminated. These tasks have already been greatly refined and, in some cases, simplified, by machines. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in machine-assisted production of reviews - the next two should see much more.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The automation of systematic reviewsBMJ, 2013
- Turning Text into Research Networks: Information Retrieval and Computational Ontologies in the Creation of Scientific DatabasesPLOS ONE, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Applications of text mining within systematic reviewsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2011
- Textpresso: An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval and Extraction System for Biological LiteraturePLoS Biology, 2004
- The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health CareAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of ResearchEducational Researcher, 1976
- Overview: maintenance therapy in psychiatry: I. SchizophreniaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1975