PDP networks can provide models that are not mere implementations of classical theories
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Philosophical Psychology
- Vol. 10 (1) , 25-40
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089708573202
Abstract
There is widespread belief that connectionist networks are dramatically different from classical or symbolic models. However, connectionists rarely test this belief by interpreting the internal structure of their nets. A new approach to interpreting networks was recently introduced by Berkeley et al. (1995). The current paper examines two implications of applying this method: (1) that the internal structure of a connectionist network can have a very classical appearance, and (2) that this interpretation can provide a cognitive theory that cannot be dismissed as a mere implementation.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisitionPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Density Plots of Hidden Value Unit Activations Reveal Interpretable BandsConnection Science, 1995
- Natural deduction in connectionist systemsSynthese, 1994
- Modifying the Generalized Delta Rule to Train Networks of Non-monotonic Processors for Pattern ClassificationConnection Science, 1992
- Networks and Theories: The Place of Connectionism in Cognitive SciencePsychological Science, 1991
- What connectionist models learn: Learning and representation in connectionist networksBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1990
- An Investigation of Trained Neural Networks from a Neurophysiological PerspectivePerception, 1989
- Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysisCognition, 1988
- A question of levels: Comment on McClelland and Rumelhart.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1985
- Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive scienceBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980