Has island biogeography theory any relevance to the design of biological reserves in New Zealand?
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
- Vol. 14 (1) , 7-10
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.1984.10421722
Abstract
Conservation reserves have one of two major aims: to conserve species richness or to conserve a particular species. Diamond’s (1975) geometric design principles, once considered particularly apt for attaining the first aim, are now reassessed and considered to be not as helpful as was once thought. The use of “incidence functions” as an aid to designing reserves for the conservation of a particular species will usually result in an overestimate of the area necessary to support a self-sustaining population. In designing reserves for this purpose, nothing takes the place of sound ecological knowledge of the species concerned.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reservesPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Modern biogeographic theory: Are there any lessons for nature reserve design?Biological Conservation, 1982
- Refuge Design and Island Biogeographic Theory: Effects of FragmentationThe American Naturalist, 1982
- The Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: Fact or Fiction?Journal of Biogeography, 1980
- Should nature reserves be large or small?Nature, 1980
- The Statistics and Biology of the Species-Area RelationshipThe American Naturalist, 1979
- Species Turnover and Equilibrium Island BiogeographyScience, 1976
- Island Biogeography Theory and Conservation PracticeScience, 1976
- Biogeographic Kinetics: Estimation of Relaxation Times for Avifaunas of Southwest Pacific IslandsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1972