Randomized Phase III Trial of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy Supported by Whole-Blood Hematopoietic Progenitors in Better-Prognosis Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open Access
- 4 May 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 97 (9) , 666-674
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji114
Abstract
Background: Recent dose-intensity studies of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have yielded conflicting results. We carried out a phase III randomized trial in patients with better-prognosis SCLC (i.e., prognostic score of 0–1) to investigate whether doubling the dose density of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy with filgrastim and blood-progenitor-cell support improves survival, compared with standard ICE chemotherapy. Methods: We studied 318 patients with pathologically proven SCLC who were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of ICE chemotherapy with a 4-week (standard arm) or 2-week (dose-dense arm) interval between cycles. Patients in the dose-dense arm received filgrastim subcutaneously daily on days 4 through 14 and had autologous blood collected before cycles 2 through 6, which was returned 24 hours after treatment. Toxicities, including hematologic toxicity and incidence of neutropenic sepsis, were monitored. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The delivered median dose intensity was 99% (interquartile range = 96%–100%) for the standard arm and 182% (interquartile range = 163%–196%) for the dose-dense arm. After a median follow-up of 14 months, overall response to treatment was observed in 118 (80%) of the 148 evaluable patients in the standard arm and in 129 (88%) of the 147 evaluable patients in the dose-dense arm, a statistically non-significant difference. Median overall survival was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.9 to 15.8 months) in the standard arm and 14.4 months (95% CI = 12.7 to 16.0) in the dose-dense arm, and the 2-year survival was 22% (95% CI = 16% to 29%) and 19% (95% CI = 14% to 27%), respectively—neither difference being statistically significant. The median treatment free time was 286 days (95% CI = 229 to 343 days) for the standard arm and 367 days (95% CI = 321 to 413 days) for the dose-dense arm (difference = 81 days; P = .109). Statistically significantly more hematologic toxicity was reported in the dose-dense arm than in the standard arm, but the number of cycles complicated by neutropenic sepsis was statistically significantly higher in the standard arm than in the dose-dense arm (15.3% versus 11.6%, respectively; difference = 3.7%, 95% CI = −4.1% to 11.5%; P = .03). Conclusions: Dose-dense ICE chemotherapy for SCLC led to shorter treatment duration and less neutropenic sepsis than did standard ICE but did not improve overall survival.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Review Evaluating the Timing of Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Combined Modality Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancerCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004
- O-68 Long term results of a phase III trial comparing once a day radiotherapy (qd RT) or twice a day radiotherapy (bid RT) in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC)Lung Cancer, 2003
- O-276 A single center, controlled study of standard versus dose intensified chemotherapyy with sequential reinfusion of haematopoetic progenitor cells in small cell lung cancer: final resultsLung Cancer, 2003
- O-275 Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide with mid-cycle vincristine (ICE-V) versus standard chemotherapy (C) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and good performance status (PS): results of an MRC randomized trial (LU21)Lung Cancer, 2003
- O-69 A randomized study of timing of thoracic irradiation in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) — study 8Lung Cancer, 2003
- O-73 High dose, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with daily chemotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancerLung Cancer, 2003
- Twenty‐five years of clinical research for patients with limited‐stage small cell lung carcinoma in North AmericaCancer, 2002
- Five-Day Oral Etoposide2 Treatment for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Comparison With Intravenous ChemotherapyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993