Non-negative differentially constrained entropy-like regularization
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Inverse Problems
- Vol. 12 (1) , 35-53
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/12/1/004
Abstract
Classical maximum entropy is quite popular, not only because it is based on appropriate physical and phenomenological concepts, but also because it yields, among other things, a natural way in which to invoke, or even force, a positivity constraint. However, though it is known to converge with reasonable rates of convergence and to exhibit good stability properties, it is, from a practical point of view, flawed, because of its inherent shrinkage properties. This has been well documented along with the fact that it can, when the circumstances are appropriate, exhibit super-resolution behaviour. Thus, there is a clear need to examine whether the maximum entropy functional can be modified in a way which, on the one hand, removes the shrinkage difficulty and, on the other hand, guarantees good asymptotics for the oversmoothed solution as well as reasonable rates of convergence and appropriate stability. This is the goal of the present paper. In particular, it is shown how such results are obtained by simply replacing the function u in the classical entropy regularizor by a differential operator , which may have a non-trivial null space. Such regularizors will be called non-negative differentially constrained entropy-like regularizors. The utility of such regularizors is examined not only in terms of the standard stability, convergence and rates of convergence, but also in terms of the important practical measures of asymptotics and shrinkage. In particular, it is shown that the unwanted shrinkage does not, in general, hold for such entropy-like regularizors, the choice of which can be more specifically adapted to the problem context of the regularization than its classical counterpart. Some practical aspects of these entropy-like regularizors are briefly discussed in the introduction. In particular, because such regularizors automatically guarantee the positivity of , the regularized approximations thereby generated will retain the monotonicity or convexity of the underlying solution u if is taken to be or , respectively.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weakly closed nonlinear operators and parameter identification in parabolic equations by tikhonov regularizationApplicable Analysis, 1994
- Maximum Entropy Regularization for Fredholm Integral Equations of the First KindSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 1993
- Convergence Rates for Maximum Entropy RegularizationSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1993
- On the failure of maximum entropy reconstruction for Fredholm equations and other infinite systemsMathematical Programming, 1993
- Maximum entropy regularization of Fredholm integral equations of the first kindInverse Problems, 1991
- Convergence rates for Tikhonov regularisation of non-linear ill-posed problemsInverse Problems, 1989
- Which is the better entropy expression for speech processing: -S log S or log S?IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1984
- On the rationale of maximum-entropy methodsProceedings of the IEEE, 1982
- Restoring with Maximum Likelihood and Maximum Entropy*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1972
- Solving linear least squares problems by Gram-Schmidt orthogonalizationBIT Numerical Mathematics, 1967