On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones

Abstract
The intensity jnd is often assumed to depend on the slope of the loudness function. One way to test this assumption is to measure the jnd for a sound that falls on distinctly different loudness functions. Two such functions were generated by presenting a 1000‐Hz tone in narrow‐band noise (925–1080 Hz) set at 70 dB SPL and in wideband noise (75–9600 Hz) set at 80 dB SPL. Over a range from near threshold to about 75 dB SPL, the loudness function for the tone is much steeper in the narrow‐band noise than in the wideband noise. At 72 dB SPL, where the two loudness curves cross, the tone’s jnd was measured in each noise by a block up–down two‐interval forced‐choice procedure. Despite the differences in slope (and in sensation level), the jnd (ΔI/I) is nearly the same in the two noises, 0.22 in narrow‐band noise and 0.20 in wideband noise. The mean value of 0.21 is close to the value of 0.25 interpolated from Jesteadt e t a l. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 6 1, 169–176 (1977)] for a 1000‐Hz tone that had the same loudness in quiet as did our 72‐dB tone in noise, but lay on a loudness function with a much lower slope. These and other data demonstrate that intensity discrimination for pure tones is unrelated to the slope of the loudness function.

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit: