Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 50 (9) , 1085-1113
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000903
Abstract
The paper argues against attempts to create a single framework for understanding organizational learning. Relevant literature is reviewed from six disciplinary perspectives: psychology and OD; management science; sociology and organizational theory; strategy; production management; and cultural anthropology. It is argued that each discipline provides distinct contributions and conceptions of problems. Furthermore, a basic distinction between organizational learning and the new idea of the learning organization is noted. Whereas the former is discipline based and analytic, the latter is multidisciplinary and emphasizes action and the creation of an "ideal-type" of organization. Due to the diversity of purpose and perspective, it is suggested that it is better to consider organizational learning as a multidisciplinary field containing complementary contributions and research agendas.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rearticulating Organizational IdentityManagement Learning, 1995
- The Transfer of Management Innovations from JapanOrganization Studies, 1995
- The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the FieldHuman Relations, 1995
- The Learning Organization, Power, Politics and Ideology IntroductionManagement Learning, 1995
- The Learning Organization: Adult Learning and Organizational TransformationBritish Journal of Management, 1994
- The myopia of learningStrategic Management Journal, 1993
- Towards the Learning CompanyManagement Education and Development, 1989
- The analysis of culture in complex societiesEthnos, 1989
- Enacting Market Crisis: The Social Construction of a Speculative BubbleAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1988
- The formation of learning sets.Psychological Review, 1949