The role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the post-transplant period
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Vol. 29 (9) , 737-743
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703539
Abstract
The administration of G-CSF post transplant has been shown to accelerate the time to neutrophil engraftment. However, this does not necessarily translate into a meaningful clinical benefit to the patient. This randomized study was designed to determine the role of G-CSF following transplantation in patients with breast cancer (BC). A total of 241 evaluable patients with BC were included. There were 200 patients with high-risk BC, and 41 had disseminated BC in complete remission. All patients received conventional dose chemotherapy prior to transplantation. Patients were mobilized with G-CSF, received the STAMP V regimen, were transplanted with 2.5 × 106 of CD34+ cells/kg and were then randomized to receive 5 μg/kg of G-CSF starting on the day of infusion (arm A), five days later (arm B), or no G-CSF (arm C). The need for transfusion support, infectious complications and length of hospitalization were the variables chosen to demonstrate clinical benefit. Patients receiving G-CSF reached 500 and 1000 neutrophils significantly faster (P = 0.001) than patients with no G-CSF. This translated into a significantly (P < 0.05) shorter hospitalization time for patients receiving G-CSF. Arm C was closed and, after recruiting 110 patients in arm A, and 106 in arm B, the significant difference in neutrophil recovery persisted with no difference in the time of hospitalization between arms A and B. Therefore, G-CSF significantly accelerates the time to neutrophil engraftment. This translates into a shorter time of hospitalization. There is no difference in this variable regarding the time of administering the G-CSF: day 0 vs day +5. Therefore, G-CSF on day +5 should be the standard in this setting.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Severe Chemotherapy-Induced Afebrile NeutropeniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patientsThe Lancet, 1996
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor following peripheral-blood progenitor-cell transplant in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation mobilised by r-metHuG-CSF (Filgrastim); a Less costly alternative to autologous bone marrow transplantationEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Durability of hematopoiesis following autografting with peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitorsAnnals of Oncology, 1994
- Filgrastim fails to improve haemopoietic reconstitution following myeloablative chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell rescueBritish Journal of Cancer, 1994
- Placebo-controlled phase III trial of lenograstim in bone-marrow transplantationThe Lancet, 1994
- Reduction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor of Fever and Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Patients with Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AND NEUTROPHIL RECOVERY AFTER HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY AND AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONThe Lancet, 1989
- High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation after Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy in Adults with Intermediate-Grade or High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987