Relationship Between Bone Quantitative Ultrasound and Fractures: A Meta-Analysis
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 21 (7) , 1126-1135
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060417
Abstract
Introduction: Bone quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has emerged as a promising technique to evaluate bone status. The aim of this study was to determine the association between measurements of OUS with the risk of fracture. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies published between 1985 and June 2005 with a baseline measurement of QUS and subsequent follow-up for fractures was carried out. Fourteen separate study populations, consisting of about 47,300 individuals (85.4% women), with about 124,000 person-years of observation and over 2350 fractures, including 653 hip, 529 forearm, and 386 humeral fractures, were analyzed. The main outcome measure was the estimated relative risk of fracture for a decrease in bone QUS parameters of 1 SD below sex- and age-adjusted mean in women. Results: Eleven studies evaluated QUS at the heel, with patella and phalanx (two studies each) and distal radius (one study) being scarcely used. There was not significant heterogeneity among the studies included in the review. Relative risk estimates (95% CI) for overall fractures were 1.55 (1.35-1.78) for each SD decrease in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), 1.63 (1.37-1.93) for speed of sound (SOS), and 1.74 (1.39-2.17) for QUS index/stiffness index (QUI/SI). Risk estimates were similar or slightly higher for hip fractures and low-energy trauma fractures. Humeral and forearm/wrist fractures were also related with lower QUS values. Conclusions: Measurements of bone QUS are significantly associated with nonspinal fracture risk in older women in a similar degree to DXA. QUS may be a valid alternative to evaluate fracture risk in situations where DXA is not accessible.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does follow-up duration influence the ultrasound and DXA prediction of hip fracture? The EPIDOS prospective studyBone, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk AssessmentJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Discriminatory Ability of Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters and Bone Mineral Density in a Population-Based Sample of Postmenopausal Women With Vertebral Fractures: Results of the Basel Osteoporosis StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2002
- Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study: Age-Related Changes, Diagnostic Sensitivity, and Discrimination PowerJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2000
- Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current StatusJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Ultrasound velocity through bone predicts incident vertebral deformityJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986