Divisionalization and Size: A Theoretical and Empirical Critique
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organization Studies
- Vol. 3 (4) , 321-337
- https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068200300402
Abstract
Previous work on large business organizations in advanced industrial countries has established that the substitution of a multidivisional for a functional structure is related to the degree of diversification. However, there also exists some theory and evidence which asserts the importance of size for divisionalization. This article examines the issue theoretically and empirically and concludes that divisionalization is more closely associated with diversification than with size, and that the former relationship predominates statistically. The argument from diversification is shown to be more cogent theoretically than that from size.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dimensions of Organizational Structure: A Critical Replication.The Academy of Management Journal, 1980
- Strategy, Structure, the Environment, and Financial Performance in 48 United Kingdom Companies.The Academy of Management Journal, 1980
- Strategy, Structure, the Environment, and Financial Performance in 48 United Kingdom CompaniesThe Academy of Management Journal, 1980
- Organization Structure and Technology in Manufacturing: System Versus Work Flow Level Perspectives.The Academy of Management Journal, 1980
- Some Elements of Organisational Control in Australian Divisionalised FirmsAustralian Journal of Management, 1979
- Organizational Choices and General Management Influence Networks in Divisionalized Companies.The Academy of Management Journal, 1978
- Strategy Formulation as a Political ProcessInternational Studies of Management & Organization, 1977
- The Emerging European EnterprisePublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston StudyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1972
- Interdependence and hierarchy in organizationsSocial Science Research, 1972