Application of a Comprehensive Bias-Correction Model to Precipitation Measured at Russian North Pole Drifting Stations
Open Access
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Vol. 3 (6) , 700-713
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0700:aoacbc>2.0.co;2
Abstract
An improved bias correction is applied to daily precipitation measured at Russian North Pole drifting stations during the period from the early 1950s through 1990. The bias-correction method is based on a model accounting for all main systematic errors of precipitation measurement by means of the standard Tretyakov gauge, namely: aerodynamic error; joint effect of wetting, evaporation, and condensation at the gauge collector interior; trace precipitation; and the effect of “false” precipitation due to blowing snow flux into the gauge. The bias-corrected annual precipitation averaged over the entire period and all drifting stations amounts to 165 mm, which is 28% higher than the measured value. Large errors induced by strong winds are to a certain extent compensated by the false precipitation, the amount of which increases with the wind speed and blizzard duration. Annual mean false precipitation comprises 30% of the total measured precipitation. The validity of the obtained bias-corrected estimat... Abstract An improved bias correction is applied to daily precipitation measured at Russian North Pole drifting stations during the period from the early 1950s through 1990. The bias-correction method is based on a model accounting for all main systematic errors of precipitation measurement by means of the standard Tretyakov gauge, namely: aerodynamic error; joint effect of wetting, evaporation, and condensation at the gauge collector interior; trace precipitation; and the effect of “false” precipitation due to blowing snow flux into the gauge. The bias-corrected annual precipitation averaged over the entire period and all drifting stations amounts to 165 mm, which is 28% higher than the measured value. Large errors induced by strong winds are to a certain extent compensated by the false precipitation, the amount of which increases with the wind speed and blizzard duration. Annual mean false precipitation comprises 30% of the total measured precipitation. The validity of the obtained bias-corrected estimat...Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Bias-Corrected Siberian Regional Precipitation ClimatologyJournal of Hydrometeorology, 2001
- Increased Precipitation in the Norwegian Arctic: True or False?Climatic Change, 2000
- Snow Depth on Arctic Sea IceJournal of Climate, 1999
- An improved precipitation climatology for the Arctic OceanGeophysical Research Letters, 1999
- Bias correction of daily precipitation measurements for GreenlandJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- Adjustment of daily precipitation data at 10 climate stations in Alaska: Application of World Meteorological Organization intercomparison resultsWater Resources Research, 1998
- Measurements of precipitation and snow pack at Russian North Pole drifting stationsPolar Record, 1998
- Accuracy of tretyakov precipitation gauge: Result of wmo intercomparisonHydrological Processes, 1995
- Accuracy of precipitation measurements for hydrologic modelingWater Resources Research, 1974