Review of Determinants of Patients’ Preferences for Adjuvant Therapy in Cancer
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (15) , 3181-3190
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.06.109
Abstract
Purpose Many studies have determined cancer patients’ preferences for adjuvant therapy, for example, by asking patients the extent of benefit they would need in order to accept the therapy. However, little is known about the determinants that influence these preferences. Our research goal was to explore which determinants underlie patients’ preferences by means of a literature review. Methods PubMed searches were conducted to identify studies in which cancer patients’ preferences for adjuvant therapy had been elicited by means of a treatment preference instrument. Twenty-three papers were evaluated with regard to reported relationships between preferences and potential determinants. A total of 40 determinants were recorded and classified into one of seven categories: (1) treatment-related determinants, (2) sociodemographic characteristics and current quality of life, (3) clinical characteristics, (4) measurement instrument-related determinants, (5) time-related determinants, (6) cognitive/affective determinants, and (7) specialist-related determinants. Results The benefit and toxicity of treatment, experience of the treatment, and having dependents (eg, children) living at home were important determinants of patients’ preferences. Furthermore, qualitative data suggested that cognitive/affective and specialist-related determinants might have a large impact on patients’ treatment preferences. Conclusion Our results show that patients’ preferences cannot fully be explained on the basis of treatment-related determinants and patient and clinical characteristics. More research is needed in the area of cognitive/affective and specialist-related determinants because of the lack of quantitative results. Furthermore, we recommend carrying out larger studies in which the (internal) relationships between determinants and preferences are assessed in the context of a cognitive cost-benefit model.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a review of what makes it worthwhile?The Lancet Oncology, 2001
- Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?British Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy for early breast cancer: doubts and decisionsThe Lancet, 1998
- Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Breast cancer patients' attitudes about rationing postlumpectomy radiation therapy: applicability of trade-off methods to policy-making.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Breast cancer: the real challengeThe Lancet, 1997
- Offering Choice of treatment to patients with cancers. A review based on a symposium held at the 10th annual conference of the British psychosocial oncology group, December 1993European Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- Someone to live for: social well-being, parenthood status, and decision-making in oncology.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: Influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferencesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987