I. The Guildhall Declaration of 11 December 1688 and the Counter-Revolution of the Loyalists
- 1 September 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Historical Journal
- Vol. 11 (3) , 403-420
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00001618
Abstract
‘Wee can neither Swear a new Allegiance nor Transfer ye Old; nor Assist at any Coronation while K.[ing] James the second Liue's. In these few words penned on 17 February 1689, within days of the proclamation of William and Mary, Bishop Turner of Ely scaled the heights and plumbed the depths of the loyalists’ dilemma. The unexpected manner in which the Revolution had been accomplished entailed upon churchmen a deep and bitter conflict of loyalties. Certainly none were more afflicted than the Cavalier politicians, prelates and magnates of the Church of England party, who less than a decade before had drawn together in defence of the lawful succession, the established religion and the privileges of the governing classes. As one might suspect, the re-emergence of the Cavalier leaders in the autumn of 1688, from the isolation into which they had been ungenerously thrown by the King's espousal of Indulgence, had important repercussions on events following James's abandonment of government. Yet, while contemporary attitudes to civil obedience have received close study, curiously little attention has been given to the role of James's supporters in the practical politics of the crisis, especially in its initial stages.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- II. The Commission for Ecclesiastical Promotions, 1681–84: An Instrument of Tory ReactionThe Historical Journal, 1967
- The Mob and the Revolution of 1688The Journal of British Studies, 1964
- The Legal and Philosophical Position of the Jacobites, 1688-1689The Journal of Modern History, 1950