The Nonrevolutionary Peasantry of Modern Iran
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Iranian Studies
- Vol. 11 (1-4) , 259-304
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00210867808701546
Abstract
The persistence of tradition needs explanation as much as change. It may be that people cleave to ancestral ways through general inertia, but it is more likely that there are good and sufficient reasons behind such persistence, much as there are good and sufficient reasons for change.The social scientist studying the modern world is inevitably struck by the importance of peasant rebellions. In some countries--such as Russia, Yugoslavia, Albania, China, Cuba, and Vietnam--peasant rebellions have helped bring about communist revolutions. In others--such as Mexico, Algeria, Kenya, and recently Angola--they have contributed toward the success of nationalist revolutions. In yet other countries--including Spain, Greece, Peru, India, Phillippines, Malaya, and Indonesia--they have helped shake, even though they have not destroyed, the foundations of the old order. The social scientist studying Iran, however, is struck not by the importance but by the conspicuous absence of any large-scale peasant rebellions in the modern era.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rural/Urban Relations and Peasant Radicalism: A Preliminary StatementComparative Studies in Society and History, 1976
- Peasant classes and primordial loyaltiesThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1973
- Peasants and politicsThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1973
- The Representative Mediator and the New Peasant1American Anthropologist, 1971
- The Ecology of Peasant Communism in IndiaAmerican Political Science Review, 1971
- The Crowd in The Persian RevolutionIranian Studies, 1969
- New MembersAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1969
- CLIMATEPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1968
- THE CROWD IN IRANIAN POLITICS 1905‐1953Past & Present, 1968