A Shot in the Dark: Shott's Comments on Nance and Ball
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 54 (2) , 405-412
- https://doi.org/10.2307/281715
Abstract
Shott's comments on Nance and Ball's article on test-pit sampling are off the mark. His comments reveal that Shott has misread the authors, that he generally has misinterpreted their intent, that he does not understand their research design and therefore does not know how to apply their findings, that he overlooks or avoids numerous important points made by the authors, and that he has his own unique view of archaeological data and survey methods.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shovel-Test Sampling in Archaeological Survey: Comments on Nance and Ball, and LightfootAmerican Antiquity, 1989
- No Surprises? The Reliability and Validity of Test Pit SamplingAmerican Antiquity, 1986
- Discovering Sites UnseenPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- Regional Sampling in Archaeological Survey: The Statistical PerspectivePublished by Elsevier ,1983
- Regional Subsampling and Statistical Inference in Forested HabitatsAmerican Antiquity, 1979