Factor Indeterminacy in the 1930’s and the 1970’s Some Interesting Parallels
- 1 June 1979
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 44 (2) , 157-167
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293967
Abstract
The issue of factor indeterminacy, and its meaning and significance for factor analysis, has been the subject of considerable debate in recent years. Interestingly, the identical issue was discussed widely in the literature of the late 1920's and early 1930's, but this early discussion was somehow lost or forgotten during the development and popularization of multiple factor analysis. There are strong parallels between the arguments in the early literature, and those which have appeared in recent papers. Here I review the history of this early literature, briefly survey the more recent work, and discuss these parallels where they are especially illuminating.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the validity of indeterminate factor scoresBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978
- REGRESSION COMPONENT ANALYSISBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976
- On the Factor Score ControversyPsychometrika, 1976
- On Factors and Factor ScoresPsychometrika, 1967
- “Best Possible” Systematic Estimates of CommunalitiesPsychometrika, 1956
- THE DETERMINACY OF FACTOR SCORE MATRICES WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR FIVE OTHER BASIC PROBLEMS OF COMMON‐FACTOR THEORY1British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955
- THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF FACTOR ANALYSISBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1952
- THE CONVERSE OF SPEARMAN'S TWO-FACTOR THEOREMBiometrika, 1932
- The theory of factors. II.Psychological Review, 1928
- The theory of factors.Psychological Review, 1928