Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Farmer Reality
Top Cited Papers
- 3 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Vol. 28 (3) , 97-122
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902776358
Abstract
Improving food security, environmental preservation and enhancing livelihood should be the main targets of the innovators of today's farming systems. Conservation agriculture (CA), based on minimum tillage, crop residue retention, and crop rotations, has been proposed as an alternative system combining benefits for the farmer with advantages for the society. This paper reviews the potential impact of CA on C sequestration by synthesizing the knowledge of carbon and nitrogen cycling in agriculture; summarizing the influence of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on soil organic carbon stocks; and compiling the existing case study information. To evaluate the C sequestration capacity of farming practices, their influence on emissions from farming activities should be considered together with their influence on soil C stocks. The largest contribution of CA to reducing emissions from farming activities is made by the reduction of tillage operations. The soil C case study results are not conclusive. In 7 of the 78 cases withheld, the soil C stock was lower in zero compared to conventional tillage, in 40 cases it was higher, and in 31 of the cases there was no significant difference. The mechanisms that govern the balance between increased or no sequestration after conversion to zero tillage are not clear, although some factors that play a role can be distinguished, e.g., root development and rhizodeposits, baseline soil C content, bulk density and porosity, climate, landscape position, and erosion/deposition history. Altering crop rotation can influence soil C stocks by changing quantity and quality of organic matter input. More research is needed, especially in the tropical areas where good quantitative information is lacking. However, even if C sequestration is questionable in some areas and cropping systems, CA remains an important technology that improves soil processes, controls soil erosion and reduces production cost.Keywords
This publication has 189 references indexed in Scilit:
- Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environmentsCurrent Opinion in Plant Biology, 2008
- Review of literature on economics and policy of carbon sequestration in agricultural soilsManagement of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2008
- Soil erosion and agricultural sustainabilityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Principles and Practice of Soil Science. The Soil as a Natural Resource. 4th Edition. By R. E. White. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (2006), pp. 363, £29.99. (paperback). ISBN 0-632-06455-2Experimental Agriculture, 2006
- Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regionsBiogeochemistry, 2005
- Effect of no-tillage on turnover of organic matter in a Rhodic FerralsolSoil Use and Management, 2003
- Tillage effects on soil organic carbon distribution and storage in a silt loam soil in IllinoisSoil and Tillage Research, 1999
- Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controlsGeoderma, 1996
- Transformation of the soil structure through Pontoscolex corethrurus (Oligochaeta) intestinal tractGeoderma, 1993
- Biotisch und abiotisch gesteuerter Abbau von organischer Substanz im BodenJournal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 1984