Prognostic Value of Histological Grade and Nuclear Grade in Renal Adenocarcinoma
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 151 (5) , 1174-1176
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35206-0
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective study of 237 cases of clinically localized renal adenocarcinoma treated at our department between November 1971 and December 1991 by radical nephrectomy. The parameters considered were tumor extension (pT stage), histological grading and nuclear grading. If the histological grade proved to be of little informational value in regard to survival, nuclear grade and pT stage had significant impact. On the other hand, nuclear grading considered in a given stage provided no significant influence. We conclude that nuclear grading cannot predict the outcome of patients at the same surgical stage.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Microscopic Venous Infiltration As Predictor Of Relapse In Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1992
- Role of nuclear grading in stage I renal cell carcinomaUrology, 1989
- Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Related to Nuclear Grade, DNA Content and Robson StageEuropean Urology, 1986
- Prognostic Factors in Renal Carcinoma. An Evaluation of Operative FindingsBritish Journal of Urology, 1984
- Stratification of risk factors in renal cell carcinomaCancer, 1983
- Prognostic Indicators in Renal AdenocarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1983
- Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1982
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinomaA clinical and pathologic study of 309 casesCancer, 1971
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958