An fMRI Analysis of the Human Hippocampus: Inference, Context, and Task Awareness
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MIT Press in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Vol. 18 (7) , 1156-1173
- https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1156
Abstract
The hippocampus is critical for encoding and retrieving semantic and episodic memories. Animal studies indicate that the hippocampus is also required for relational learning tasks. A prototypical relational learning task, and the one investigated in this experiment, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, is the transitive inference (TI) task. In the TI task, participants were to choose between A and B (A?B) and learned by trial and error to choose A (A > B). There were four such premise pairs during a training (A > B, B > C, C > D, D > E). These can be acquired distinctly or can be organized into a superordinate hierarchy (A > B > C > D > E), which would efficiently represent all the learned relations and allow inferences (e.g., B > D). At test there was no reinforcement: In addition to premise pairs, untrained pairings were introduced (e.g., A?E, B?D). Correctly inferring that B > D is taken as evidence for the formation of a superordinate hierarchy; several alternatives to the superordinate hierarchy hypothesis are considered. Awareness of the formation of this hierarchy was measured by a postscan questionnaire. Four main findings are reported: (1) Inferential performance and task awareness dissociated behaviorally and at the level of hemodynamic response; (2) As expected, performance on the inferred relation, B > D, corresponded to the ability to simultaneously acquire B > C and C > D premise pairs during training; (3) Interestingly, acquiring these “inner pairs” corresponded to greater hippocampal activation than the “outer pairs” (A > B, D > E) for all participants. However, a distinct pattern of hippocampal activity for these inner pairs differentiated those able to perform the inferential discrimination, B > D, at test. Because these inner premise pairs require contextual discrimination (e.g., C is incorrect in the context of B but correct in the context of D), we argue that the TI task is hippocampal-dependent because the premise pair acquisition necessary for inference is hippocampal-dependent; (4) We found B > D related hippocampal activity at test that is anatomically consistent with preconsolidation recall effects shown in other studies.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hippocampal activation during transitive inference in humansHippocampus, 2004
- Recognition Memory and the Human HippocampusNeuron, 2003
- Retrograde amnesia and consolidation: Anatomical and lesion considerationsHippocampus, 2001
- Multiple trace theory of human memory: Computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological resultsHippocampus, 2000
- Encoding and retrieval in human medial temporal lobes: An empirical investigation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Hippocampus, 1999
- Memory for Items and Memory for Relations in the Procedural/Declarative Memory FrameworkMemory, 1997
- Cognitive function in mammals: the evolutionary perspectiveCognitive Brain Research, 1996
- AFNI: Software for Analysis and Visualization of Functional Magnetic Resonance NeuroimagesComputers and Biomedical Research, 1996
- Implicit Memory in Amnesic Patients: Evidence for Spared Auditory PrimingPsychological Science, 1994
- LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONSJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1957