Estimating the distribution of the window period for recent HIV infections: A comparison of statistical methods
Open Access
- 16 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 29 (30) , 3194-3202
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3941
Abstract
In the past few years a number of antibody biomarkers have been developed to distinguish between recent and established Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Typically, a specific threshold/cut‐off of the biomarker is chosen, values below which are indicative of recent infections. Such biomarkers have attracted considerable interest as the basis for incidence estimation using a cross‐sectional sample. An estimate of HIV incidence can be obtained from the prevalence of recent infection, as measured in the sample, and knowledge of the time spent in the recent infection state, known as the window period. However, such calculations are based on a number of assumptions concerning the distribution of the window period. We compare two statistical methods for estimating the mean and distribution of a window period using data on repeated measurements of an antibody biomarker from a cohort of HIV seroconverters. The methods account for the interval‐censored nature of both the date of seroconversion and the date of crossing a specific threshold. We illustrate the methods using repeated measurements of the Avidity Index (AI) and make recommendations about the choice of threshold for this biomarker so that the resulting window period satisfies the assumptions for incidence estimation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating incubation period distributions with coarse dataStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Should biomarker estimates of HIV incidence be adjusted?AIDS, 2009
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Antibody Avidity Testing To Identify Recent Infection in Newly Diagnosed HIV Type 1 (HIV-1)-Seropositive Persons Infected with Diverse HIV-1 SubtypesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Comparison of HIV Type 1 Incidence Observed during Longitudinal Follow-Up with Incidence Estimated by Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the BED Capture Enzyme ImmunoassayAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2006
- Nonparametric estimation of the bivariate CDF for arbitrarily censored dataThe Canadian Journal of Statistics / La Revue Canadienne de Statistique, 2002
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Evaluation of a Sensitive/Less-Sensitive Testing Algorithm Using the 3A11-LS Assay for Detecting Recent HIV Seroconversion among Individuals with HIV-1 Subtype B or E Infection in ThailandAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2001
- Estimates of disease incidence in women based on antenatal or neonatal seroprevalence data: HIV in new york cityStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- A Method for Obtaining Short-Term Projections and Lower Bounds on the Size of the AIDS EpidemicJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988